<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Botanic Gardens Ochid Show 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reclusland.com/compass/2009/04/29/new-york-botanic-gardens-ochid-show-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reclusland.com/compass/2009/04/29/new-york-botanic-gardens-ochid-show-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:46:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.reclusland.com/compass/2009/04/29/new-york-botanic-gardens-ochid-show-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2000</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclusland.com/compass/?p=1450#comment-2000</guid>
		<description>Yeah, my digits are definitely guilty on both counts...

Right, so, more focus on taking the actual pictures, and less on the PS!  Course, I usually only use PS for correcting exposure/lighting, stuff like that, cause I have a not-so-fancy digital camera and the pics don&#039;t always come out right.  The data&#039;s there, just not presentable, so I have to adjust highlights/shadows...  etc etc..  

But I do have a tendency to get carries away, and I definitely agree with your point SB.  From now on, the heavy photoshopping will be reserved for the artwork only (which I just realized I haven&#039;t done in quite some time...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, my digits are definitely guilty on both counts&#8230;</p>
<p>Right, so, more focus on taking the actual pictures, and less on the PS!  Course, I usually only use PS for correcting exposure/lighting, stuff like that, cause I have a not-so-fancy digital camera and the pics don&#8217;t always come out right.  The data&#8217;s there, just not presentable, so I have to adjust highlights/shadows&#8230;  etc etc..  </p>
<p>But I do have a tendency to get carries away, and I definitely agree with your point SB.  From now on, the heavy photoshopping will be reserved for the artwork only (which I just realized I haven&#8217;t done in quite some time&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speedbird</title>
		<link>http://www.reclusland.com/compass/2009/04/29/new-york-botanic-gardens-ochid-show-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1997</link>
		<dc:creator>speedbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclusland.com/compass/?p=1450#comment-1997</guid>
		<description>What I mean is, a good picture doesn&#039;t need photoshopping (though there&#039;s nothing wrong with PS for effect as a tool in itself).

There&#039;s a tendency with digits to acquire everything and sort it all out later (or not; there&#039;s also a tendency to keep loads of junk!). This leads to photographers chained to screens, not looking at the real world. I think the trick is really in acquiring the right stuff to start with. Framing, perspective, filtering, depth-of-field, exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I mean is, a good picture doesn&#8217;t need photoshopping (though there&#8217;s nothing wrong with PS for effect as a tool in itself).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a tendency with digits to acquire everything and sort it all out later (or not; there&#8217;s also a tendency to keep loads of junk!). This leads to photographers chained to screens, not looking at the real world. I think the trick is really in acquiring the right stuff to start with. Framing, perspective, filtering, depth-of-field, exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.reclusland.com/compass/2009/04/29/new-york-botanic-gardens-ochid-show-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 18:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclusland.com/compass/?p=1450#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>Well, that would make it &lt;em&gt;a lot&lt;/em&gt; easier to get around to posting photos up here.  

Perhaps I will leave off the photoshopping (except when absolutely necessary).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that would make it <em>a lot</em> easier to get around to posting photos up here.  </p>
<p>Perhaps I will leave off the photoshopping (except when absolutely necessary).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speedbird</title>
		<link>http://www.reclusland.com/compass/2009/04/29/new-york-botanic-gardens-ochid-show-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1905</link>
		<dc:creator>speedbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 15:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclusland.com/compass/?p=1450#comment-1905</guid>
		<description>No PS !

I like the tight framing on these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No PS !</p>
<p>I like the tight framing on these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

